Facial Fat Graft Injection Reduces Asymmetry and Improves Forehead Contour in Early Infancy Apert Syndrome Patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to report the outcomes of a modified comprehensive Apert syndrome surgical protocol in which fat injection was performed during early infancy concurrent with postposterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) distractor removal. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 40 consecutive young patients with Apert syndrome who underwent PVDO and subsequent distractor removal between 2012 and 2022. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients underwent facial fat injection concurrent with distractor removal to treat residual supraorbital bar recession as part of a modified comprehensive Apert syndrome surgical protocol. Preoperative and postoperative severity of recession and irregularity was graded from 1 to 3, with 1 being less severe and 3 being the most severe. Recession severity was correlated with the number and type of suture fusion. The complication rate was stratified via a Clavien-Dindo scale. RESULTS: The average patient age was 14.3±5 months, with 5 males (41.6%) and 7 females (48.3%). The average hospital stay was 1.08 days. The average volume of free fat graft injection was 8.29±5 mL. According to the Likert scale, forehead morphology improved in 91.67% of the patients. Complete resolution of supraorbital bar recession was achieved in seven patients (58.33%), all of whom presenting a single suture synostosis. One patient with a cloverleaf skull presented a type IIIB complication. CONCLUSIONS: Facial fat grafting markedly reduces forehead asymmetry and improves forehead contour in Apert syndrome patients following PVDO. Total resolution of forehead recession directly correlated with a single suture fusion.

The Role of Airway Management on Feeding Difficulties in Children With Pfeiffer Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Pfeiffer syndrome is characterized by craniosynostosis, mid-face hypoplasia, broad thumbs, and often multilevel airway obstruction. Airway management is often required, including the use of positive airway ventilation, nasopharyngeal airway (NPA), or tracheostomy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact an airway adjunct can have on feeding difficulties in children with Pfeiffer syndrome. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with Pfeiffer syndrome from January 1998 to January 2020 at one of England's 4 supraregional Craniofacial Units, Alder Hey Children's Hospital. Speech & Language Therapy case notes and medical notes were used to gather data, as well as the Oral Feeding Score component of the UK Craniofacial Outcome Score. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included. Six patients had no airway adjunct (55%): 3 had tracheostomy (27%) and 2 patients had NPA (18%). All patients with airway adjuncts were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy fed. Those who did not require an airway adjunct had an Oral Feeding Score of 4.60 (SD: 0.49). The children who went on to have an airway adjunct had a mean preintervention Oral Feeding Score of 2.4 (SD: 0.8). The mean feeding score (postairway adjunct) in the NPA group was 2.0, compared with the tracheostomy group scoring 3.0. CONCLUSIONS: Children with Pfeiffer syndrome who require airway intervention have more significant feeding problems requiring feeding intervention. Although there were small numbers included in this study, there is a suggestion that airway adjuncts can contribute to feeding difficulties, particularly NPAs.

Apert Syndrome: Selection Rationale for Midface Advancement Technique.

Apert syndrome is characterized by a wide spectrum of craniofacial clinical features that have been successfully addressed via a variety of midface advancement techniques. Although surgeons have individual preferences as to which specific procedures should be performed to best treat Apert patients, craniofacial plastic surgeons, working in tandem with pediatric neurosurgeons, can identify and evaluate functional limitations and facial morphologic disproportions, and establish appropriate criteria for effective midface advancement technique indication and selection. The purpose of this review article is to present and discuss our rationale for midface advancement technique selection based upon the most common craniofacial characteristics presented by Apert syndrome patients. The present article also provides a grading system that stratifies as major, moderate, and mild, the effect of each midface advancement technique on the different types of Apert syndrome facial features. Surgeons should take into consideration the maximum effect and benefit of each craniofacial osteotomy and how these procedures will alter the craniofacial skeleton. By understanding the long-term effect of each osteotomy on the most common craniofacial characteristics of Apert syndrome patients, craniofacial plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons will be able to customize the surgical procedures they perform in order to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Does the Mutation Type Affect the Response to Cranial Vault Expansion in Children With Apert Syndrome?

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Apert Syndrome Type III Hand: Prevalence and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The Upton type III hand, which represents the most severe hand type among Apert syndrome patients, has been considered the least prevalent hand type. The objective of this study is to address type III Apert hand prevalence and describe treatment strategies that will result in a 5 digit hand. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 15 years of Apert syndrome hand practice at our hospital. Demographic (patient sex and age at the time of the operation), surgical (eg, techniques used for webspace release, osteotomy, and various aspects of soft-tissue reconstruction), and outcome (perioperative and long-term complication and need for revision operation) data was verified through medical records, clinical photographs, radiographic images, and interviews with patients' families. Patients who had incomplete medical records and/or postoperative follow up <6 months in length were excluded from this study. RESULTS: A total of 93 Apert patients [50 male (56.1%) and 43 female (43.9%)] were treated at our hospital from 2007 to 2021. Stratification of Apert hand severity using Upton's classification system identified 34 patients with type I hands (36.4%), 19 patients with type II hands (20.6%), and 40 patients with type III hands (43%). Of the 40 patients with type III hands a 5 digit hand was achieved for 35 patients (87%), with an average of 3.37 operations per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The Upton type III hand is the most prevalent hand type among Apert syndrome patients. Following a three stage protocol, a surgical team can consistently achieve a 5 digit hand for the majority of Apert syndrome patients with type III hands.

Comparison of Internal and External Distraction in Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement: A Three-Dimensional Quantification.

BACKGROUND: Crouzon syndrome is characterized by complex craniosynostosis and midfacial hypoplasia. Where frontofacial monobloc advancement (FFMBA) is indicated, the method of distraction used to achieve advancement holds an element of equipoise. This two-center retrospective cohort study quantifies the movements produced by internal or external distraction methods used for FFMBA. Using shape analysis, this study evaluates whether the different distraction forces cause plastic deformity of the frontofacial segment, producing distinct morphologic outcomes. METHODS: Patients with Crouzon syndrome who underwent FFMBA with internal distraction [Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (Paris, France)] or external distraction [Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (London, United Kingdom)] were compared. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files of preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans were converted to three-dimensional bone meshes and skeletal movements were assessed using nonrigid iterative closest point registration. Displacements were visualized using color maps and statistical analysis of the vectors was undertaken. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met the strict inclusion criteria. Twenty-five underwent FFMBA with external distraction and 26 with internal distraction. External distraction provides a preferential midfacial advancement, whereas internal distractors produce a more positive movement at the lateral orbital rim. This confers good orbital protection but does not advance the central midface to the same extent. Vector analysis confirmed this to be statistically significant ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic changes resulting from monobloc surgery differ depending on the distraction technique used. Although the relative merits of internal and external distraction still stand, it may be that external distraction is more suited to addressing the midfacial biconcavity seen in syndromic craniosynostosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Clinical and Genetic Studies of the First Monozygotic Twins with Pfeiffer Syndrome.

Objective: To report the clinical and radiographic findings and molecular etiology of the first monozygotic twins affected with Pfeiffer syndrome. Methods: Clinical and radiographic examination and whole exome sequencing were performed on two monozygotic twins with Pfeiffer syndrome. Results: An acceptor splice site mutation in FGFR2 (c.940-2A>G) was detected in both twins. The father and both twins shared the same haplotype, indicating that the mutant allele was from their father's chromosome who suffered severe upper airway obstruction and subsequent obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertrophy of nasal turbinates appears to be a newly recognized finding of Pfeiffer syndrome. Increased intracranial pressure in both twins were corrected early by fronto-orbital advancement with skull expansion and open osteotomy, in order to prevent the more severe consequences of increased intracranial pressure, including hydrocephalus, the bulging of the anterior fontanelle, and the diastasis of suture. Conclusions: Both twins carried a FGFR2 mutation and were discordant for lambdoid synostosis. Midface hypoplasia, narrow nasal cavities, and hypertrophic nasal turbinates resulted in severe upper airway obstruction and subsequent obstructive sleep apnea in both twins. Hypertrophy of the nasal turbinates appears to be a newly recognized finding of Pfeiffer syndrome. Fronto-orbital advancement with skull expansion and open osteotomy was performed to treat increased intracranial pressure in both twins. This is the first report of monozygotic twins with Pfeiffer syndrome.

Left Ophthalmic Segment Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Treated with Flow Diversion in a Child with Apert Syndrome: Technical Note.

INTRODUCTION: Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in children with Apert syndrome has not been described, and development of an aneurysm as a complication secondary to craniofacial surgery has never been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the rare case of a 10-year-old boy with Apert syndrome who underwent craniofacial reconstruction surgery consisting of subcranial Le Fort III osteotomies, bilateral lateral canthopexies, and nasal nares dilations for midfacial hypoplasia and resultant obstructive sleep apnea, and on routine follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 year later, he was found to have a large left ophthalmic internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm that was not seen on MRI obtained 2 years prior. Immediately after the craniofacial surgery, the patient experienced a severe headache behind his left eye and extraocular movement abnormalities that subsided over the next days to months. Given the new and rapid growth of the aneurysm on follow-up MRI, the patient underwent a diagnostic cerebral angiogram followed by successful flow diversion treatment of the aneurysm with the pipeline embolization device (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). CONCLUSION: Post-procedurally, over the next year, the patient developed word-finding difficulty and stuttering speech. He was found to have in-stent ICA stenosis and middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis at the first follow-up and underwent an initial angioplasty. After several weeks, ICA, MCA, and anterior cerebral artery stenoses were identified, and the patient underwent angioplasties for the ICA and MCA stenoses. On follow-up examination after the second procedure, the patient had tremendous improvement in his speech difficulties and was doing well clinically.

Frontofacial Reconstruction Technique Modification With Preservation of Blood Supply to the Monobloc Segment.

ABSTRACT: Craniosynostosis syndromes, including Apert Syndrome, Pfeiffer Syndrome, and Crouzon Syndrome, share similar phenotypes, including bicoronal craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, hypertelorism, and exorbitism. The standard surgical treatment for these craniofacial abnormalities is monobloc osteotomy with distraction osteogenesis. Complications of this technique include the failure of osteogenesis or resorption of the frontal bone. The authors propose an alternative surgical technique with a frontal arch in continuity with the midface segment to ensure vascularization to anterior and posterior borders of distraction. A case report of an 8-year-old female patient with Apert Syndrome is reported using our technique. Our frontal arch monobloc distraction procedure preserves blood supply to a cranial component of the monobloc segment site that becomes the anterior portion of distraction rather than with the traditional devascularized frontal bone flap. This technique modification should improve osteogenesis outcomes by preventing resorption or failure of bone formation.

[Developments in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategy of the Apert Hand]. / Entwicklungen in der Diagnostik und Planung der Therapie bei der Apert-Hand.

The necessity for early surgical correction of Apert hands for the overall child development has been highlighted repeatedly in older literature. Nevertheless, uncertainties regarding the time and the scale of the initial surgical treatment still remain. While in former times there were no regular follow-ups after the syndactyly release, we now know that during growth bony changes will develop in the Apert hand requiring regular check-ups and, in some cases, revision surgeries. Affected parents need comprehensive clarification about a clear and time-efficient therapeutic concept. This review article describes our actual concept treating Apert hands.

[The Apert Foot: Anatomical Changes, Classification, Thoughts on surgical Treatment]. / Der Apert-Fuß: Anatomische Veränderungen, Klassifikation und Überlegungen zur Operation.

Diagnosis and therapy of the Apert foot are scarcely described in extant literature. This article describes anatomical changes observed in 30 Apert feet. By analysis of X-rays and computed scans 5 types of bony Apert foot malformations were identified. We developed therapeutic recommendations based on this classification.

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with orthotic helmeting for safe improvement of head growth in children with Apert syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral coronal craniosynostosis in Apert syndrome is traditionally managed with open cranial vault remodeling procedures like fronto-orbital advancement (FOA). However, as minimally invasive procedures gain popularity, limited data exist to determine their efficacy in this syndromic population. This study examines whether endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) is inferior to FOA in correcting head growth in patients with Apert syndrome. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of children with Apert syndrome over a 23-year period. Postoperative head circumferences until 24 months of age were compared for patients treated with ESC versus FOA by using normative growth curves. Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity was compared between groups. RESULTS: The median postoperative follow-up for the FOA (n = 14) and ESC (n = 16) groups was 40 and 28.5 months, the median age at operation was 12.8 and 2.7 months, and the median operative time was 285 and 65 minutes, respectively (p < 0.001). The FOA group had significantly higher rates of blood transfusion, ICU admission, and longer hospital length of stay (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in premature reossification rates, complications, need for further procedures, or complaints of asymmetry. Compared to normative growth curves, all patients in both groups had head circumferences comparable to or above the 85th percentile at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Children with Apert syndrome and bilateral coronal craniosynostosis treated with ESC experience early normalization of head growth and cephalic index that is not inferior to those treated with FOA. Longer-term assessments are needed to determine long-term aesthetic results and the correlation between head growth and neurocognitive development in this population.

Open-wedge osteotomy for thumb radial angulation in Apert syndrome using a bone-graft substitute.

A short thumb with radial angulation causes loss of hand function in patients with Apert syndrome. Although past reports have described various procedures for the correction of the thumb, there has been no consensus on the best procedure. This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic results of a surgical technique for the correction of a thumb radial angulation deformity: open-wedge osteotomy using a bone-graft substitute. Ten patients (18 thumbs) who underwent open-wedge osteotomy on the proximal phalange using a bone-graft substitute were evaluated retrospectively. The open-wedge osteotomies had been performed at the center of the proximal phalanx. Thumb radial angles and thumb lengths were measured on radiographs, and the clinical results were investigated, including bone union and complications. The median patient age at the time of surgery was 5.8 years, and the average follow-up period was 6.7 years. The average thumb radial angle was 57.3° preoperatively, 6.5° immediately postoperatively, and 19.8° at the most recent follow-up. The average thumb length was 12.1 mm preoperatively, 18.1 mm immediately postoperatively, and 22.3 mm at the most recent follow-up, indicating an extension effect of more than 50% immediately postoperatively. In all cases, the artificial bone had been absorbed and developed into autologous bone, and there were no complications such as infection and skin necrosis. These findings suggest that open-wedge osteotomy with an artificial bone substitute is simple and effective for treating radial-angulation deformities in patients with Apert syndrome. Level of evidence: Level IV - retrospective case series.

Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement With Internal Distraction: Surgical Technique and Osteotomy Guide.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis are cranial deformities resulting from the early closure of 1 or more sutures. Concomitant facial changes are complex and usually result from the involvement of multiple sutures, which may lead to restriction of cranial growth and brain expansion, ocular compression, and breathing difficulties. Surgical techniques to correct syndromic craniosynostosis have improved over time, considerably reducing the rate of complications of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To describe in detail (step-by-step) and with pertinent anatomic considerations the technique of monobloc frontofacial advancement using internal distractors. METHODS: We describe the monobloc frontofacial advancement technique with the use of internal distractors, which we use in patients with primary syndromic craniosynostosis (Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer) who have major facial hypoplasia and secondary respiratory repercussions. To illustrate this technique, the procedure was performed in 2 cranial models: an adult artificial acrylic skull of normal morphology for better evidence of anatomic repairs and a 3-dimensional printed infant skull from a tomography file obtained from a child diagnosed with Apert syndrome. RESULTS: The benefits of osteogenic distraction and better surgical timing for each procedure are presented. We presented the changes and details of osteotomies performed during the procedure, as well as anatomic details and care regarding the pterygomaxillary dysjunction. CONCLUSION: Monobloc frontofacial distraction is a procedure with widely demonstrated aesthetic and functional results, and this detailed step-by-step description may improve familiarity with the anatomic landmarks of the procedure and provide a better dynamic understanding of the distraction process.

Zygomatic repositioning and Le Fort II distraction with intraoral devices in Apert syndrome: A case report.

The aim of this case report is to describe the surgical technique and outcome using internal intraoral distraction devices in LeFort II distraction with zygomatic repositioning (LF2ZR). In Apert syndrome the midface is characterized by a complex hypoplasia, with the central part being more affected than the lateral orbito-zygomatic complex. In LF2ZR, the zygomas are repositioned and internally fixated, and the central midface is further advanced through a LeFort II distraction. In previous publications, the distraction has been performed using external halo-based devices. It seems that the LF2ZR procedure can be planned and performed with adequate accuracy using virtual surgical planning tools. Knowledge about the possibility of using internal intraoral distraction devices in LF2ZR is important, as the inconspicuous placement of intraoral devices can be advantageous for some patients.

Absence of Bilateral Multiple Cyclovertical Muscle Insertions in a Patient With Pfeiffer Syndrome.

The authors present a case of absent multiple extraocular muscle insertions in Pfeiffer syndrome. An 8-year-old girl with Pfeiffer syndrome presented with V-pattern exotropia and left hypertropia. The absence of bilateral superior oblique, bilateral superior rectus, and left inferior rectus muscle insertions was found intraoperatively. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(2):e17-e19.].

Influence of Nonsyndromic Bicoronal Synostosis and Syndromic Influences on Orbit and Periorbital Malformation.

BACKGROUND: Oculoorbital disproportion in patients with craniosynostosis has similarities and dissimilarities between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases. The authors hypothesized that these two conditions have specific individual influences as they relate to development of the orbital and periorbital skeletons. METHODS: A total of 133 preoperative computed tomography scans (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 38; Apert syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 33; Crouzon syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 10; controls, n = 52) were included. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbit and periorbital anatomy were performed. RESULTS: Orbital cavity volume was mildly restricted in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis (7 percent, p = 0.147), but more so in Apert and Crouzon syndromes [17 percent (p = 0.002) and 21 percent (p = 0.005), respectively]. The sphenoid side angle in Apert syndrome was wider than when compared to Crouzon syndrome (p = 0.043). The ethmoid side angle in Apert patients, however, was narrower (p = 0.066) than that in Crouzon patients. Maxilla anteroposterior length was more restricted in Apert syndrome than Crouzon syndrome (21 percent, p = 0.003) and nonsyndromic cases (26 percent, p < 0.001). The posterior nasal spine position was retruded in Crouzon syndrome (39 percent, p < 0.001), yet the anterior nasal spine position was similar in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: Orbit and periorbital malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis is likely the combined influence of syndromic influences and premature suture fusion. Apert syndrome expanded the anteriorly contoured lateral orbital wall associated with bicoronal synostosis, whereas Crouzon syndrome had more infraorbital rim retrusion, resulting in more severe exorbitism. Apert syndrome developed maxillary hypoplasia, in addition to the maxillary retrusion, observed in Crouzon syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Hypertelorbitism Corrected by Facial Bipartition Improves Exotropia.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to detail perioperative ophthalmologic evaluations to characterize functional ocular outcomes after facial bipartition surgery. METHODS: Patients with hypertelorbitism who underwent facial bipartition surgery were studied specifically for eye motility disorders by separating patients into rare craniofacial clefts (midline and paramedian) (n = 34) and craniofacial dysostosis (Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer) (n = 74). Preoperative and postoperative (12 months) ophthalmologic examinations (with depth perception tests), computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed. RESULTS: Among craniofacial cleft patients, mean interdacryon distance was reduced from 39 ± 4 mm to 17 ± 2 mm, with strabismus improved from 88 percent (exotropia 82 percent) preoperatively to only 29 percent postoperatively. Depth perception improved to a lesser degree, with abnormal tests at a rate of 79 percent preoperatively to 56 percent postoperatively. Wider hypertelorbitism had a higher degree of strabismus. Among craniofacial dysostotic patients, mean interdacryon distance was reduced from 37 ± 3 mm to 17 ± 2 mm, and strabismus improved from 55 percent to only 14 percent. Depth perception improved to a lesser degree, with 68 percent abnormal tests preoperatively and 46 percent postoperatively. Apert patients had more V-pattern strabismus and exotropia (79 percent) than did other craniofacial dysostosis patients (42 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The authors' data indicate that facial bipartition for hypertelorbitism-known to improve periorbital aesthetics-also improves eye motility disturbances. Thus, vision problems related to exotropia should be considered a functional indication for facial bipartition surgery in patients with hypertelorbitism. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Computer-Assisted Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement and Facial Bipartition for Pfeiffer Syndrome: Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: In patients with Pfeiffer syndrome, several corrections are required to correct facial retrusion, maxillary deficiency, or even hypertelorism. The frontofacial monobloc advancement (FFMA) and the facial bipartition (FB) are the gold standard surgeries. We present the correction of this deformity using a simultaneous computer-assisted FFMA and FB. METHODS: The 3-dimensional surgical planning defined the virtual correction and bone-cutting guide in view of the FFMA and FB. Coronal and intraoral approaches were combined to perform the osteotomies. Four internal distractors were also placed for the postoperative distraction osteogenesis. RESULTS: We reported 2 cases of computer-assisted surgery with satisfying outcomes. The sagittal deficiency (fronto-facial retrusion) was corrected by FFMA and the transversal abnormality (i.e., hypertelorism and maxillary deficiency) by the FB, then followed by an internal distraction osteogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted surgery is helpful and a reliable option for the management of complex faciocraniosynostosis such as hypertelorism and frontofacial retrusion.